I'm told that colonizing mars is economic nonsense. The cost certainly is high. Sent in bulk (dozens at a time) it could be about $50m to $100m per colonist.
Even if this cost comes down, it probably will never come down enough that the colonists could pay for it themselves. This is why I came up with a plan where they travel for free and arrive with resources so they may have liberty.
However, that plan still has the problem in that somebody must initially come up with money that is hard to come by and could be profitably invested in ways that are a lot lower risk. So why not combine my plan with others?
Mars One thinks they can come up with $6b using a reality tv format. I estimate they will probably only come up with a third of that at best; but it turns out, if they combine it with other plans, that's more than enough. So it would be reasonable to assume they could make $20m to 50m annually with a reality show depending on their skill at presenting it. The thing is, they don't need that much skill. Have you seen what people are willing to watch? They just have to avoid being like NASA tv which has perfected the art of being irrelevant. NASA works hard not to have drama. Drama and team challenges are exactly what you need for a hit show.
Bigelow has a plan to offer an alternative to nations wanting to do research on the very limited capacity I.S.S. His plan involves two BA330 forming his Alpha Station. To buy and launch one BA330 into orbit cost about $200m. Each one time investment of $200m would have an annual profit of $234 million for as many modules as market capacity turns out to be. This could turn out to be quite a lot as even small nations would find this valuable research affordable.
Then there are people like Dennis Tito, willing to put perhaps $200m into the Inspiration Mars mission with no expectation of profit. Some of these angel investors might turn to Mars One if it's seen as viable.
So we have this worthless planet (compared to asteroids that are worth trillions. Got it.) Until people actually possess and develop it. What might be a path to getting there?
We start with the Mars One reality show assuming a more realistic $50m (rather than the $600m) annual revenue they expect. Their reality show starts with ten teams of four crew each. They plan to send one crew in ten years to mars. We are going to make some slight modification to their plans. We start by changing that to 15 teams of four each for a total of 60 rather than 40.
We make a first goal of putting a BA330 in orbit (combined with the upper stage that put them there they have 90% of a ship. Each could take six to mars orbit.) If they are making $50m per year, $200m is within their ability to get financing. This first one will be used as in Bigelow's plan to upgrade their annual income from $50m to $250m. The next year, they put a second BA300 in orbit (they can either finance this one or just pay for it, whichever makes more sense.) Now they can add a new feature to their astronaut training program: real zero g training. Each BA330 can now be host to half of three teams. Each team would have two in orbit and two on the ground. They would rotate teams (limited by the $120m cost so they may only do this as part of a special season finale which they use to build up viewership.) The challenges would include ship activities and telerobotic activities in concert with their team mates on the ground to make habitats from local resources. Those on the ground would have to show proficiency in producing items ISRU from mars regolith simulants.
The other modification is they don't go to mars 4 at a time every two years in a modified Dragon. The first mission sends 12 in two BA330 class ships (this will require four or five years of income to pay for fuel.) Landers will be waiting for them in orbit and with supplies on the surface (each lander will cost 9 months of income to pay for. They will need three.) Two years later they send 48 in two BA700 class ships (they should accumulate the expenses before sending the first mission.) This requires 12 landers or perhaps the MCT will be available. These people may remain reality tv employees, but they are also free people each making their one sq. km. ownership claim. Mars One agrees to the terms of the settlement charter and claims 60,000 sq. km. giving them 30 million half acre plots on mars for resale as part of their reality tv show. Property owners on earth would be eligible for prizes related to the properties they purchase; perhaps including a locally produced rover they could control.
Those sixty first colonists form the first of many 100 (10 x 10) sq. km. townships and elect a mayor and get on with their lives. Subsequent tv seasons form new townships with new groups of 60 trainees.
This doesn't mean everyone is living in spread out isolation. Once it's been show that living on mars is possible and that land can have a resale value, others will be able to make better business plans based on claims according to the terms of the settlement charter to add to the population. As transportation costs come down, more will be able to participate as the business cases start to close. Scientists could then be sent to mars not having to worry about survival that the colony itself provides. If worried about contamination, they're rovers can be sent separately and directly to different parts of the planet.
By emphasizing skills that allow ISRU independence we avoid the suicide mission of the original Mars One plan that is too dependent on life support from earth.
Forming townships allows more property values to appreciate quicker than if there were only one population center. This would also allow local government diversity not dominated by a few.
5 comments:
I don't see a problem to get finance for Mars settlement. Your propositions can be real.
But this doesn't give it attribute of "economic sense".
You can be able to get money to put people on Mars, but you are unable to get money from people on Mars.
For sure someday in future, but not right now or shortly after first Mars mayor elections.
You can only hope settlers will be able to find some resources and will be able to use them and survive and maybe once send market space ship back to the Earth.
(sorry for my english)
All true. Now is not the time to be looking for a huge payback. That payback comes later.
However, people on earth can participate simply by owning stock in companies that are growing where ever in the solar system that is. A growing population contributes to that growth.
This charter will be a legally binding contract on it's members.
Under what legal regime will it be "legally binding"? US federal law? International law? Something else?
Come on Jim, it's obvious it would not be under US or international law until they choose to recognize it which they will have to.
First it will be legal because it is a contract between it's members.
Second because of the natural law right to possess stuff which is the oldest and most established law of all.
Third, because they by possession have jurisdiction that no other entity has.
Fourth, because politically they will be heroes fighting for survival and the improvement of humanity.
Fifth, because possession of that which is not possessed is a moral obligation. Poverty kills. To not allow the overall increase in wealth is immoral.
Sixth, other than natural law, all laws are made by men that are equal. None precedes another. It is only by the misuse of force that it can be otherwise.
Seventh, actions speak louder than words. That includes all the lawyers on earth, each and every one in total, babbling about that which they have no jurisdiction. By taking possession the martians have the only jurisdiction.
Eighth, chain of title, in all cases, starts with a claim. Once title begins to be transferred, from sellers to buyers that chain legally establishes their ownership.
The confusion is that nations have always used their power to usurp ownership. However, even so, individuals have been able throughout history to overcome that force. Squatters rights, for example, have always won when done in an acceptable manner even when ownership beforehand was NOT in dispute. People proceed nations (the idea known as American exceptionalism which is lost on the current political hoard) this has always been so, but until this country was founded, never recognized.
Post a Comment